Constitutional Remark of the Day

rush limbaugh was just saying that the presidency is an attractive goal more than ever now because obama has elevated its power status by ignoring the constitution. which tells me - but apparently doesnt tell anyone else - that the constitution is basically useless and powerless against a negro muslim commie homosexual unemployable asshole. so why is anyone in their right mind saying things like "we have to defend and preserve the constitution"? what, we need it so that it can be ignored? you dont need something that can be ignored. unless youre retarded. then you might need such a thing. cause reetards aleways need things normal people just ignore. like, you know, their dolly. or their blanky.

Aphorism Of The Day

the purpose of the constitution is not to safeguard you from the government. its to safeguard the government from you. "we the people" is not you. it's the feds. within the 5000 words are a few bones thrown your way. the rest is a huge succulent carcass of warm steaming barbeque for bureaucrats.____me

The Masons, The Constitution, and Conspiracies

     If you read the Constitution and you don't fall asleep, you will notice that the iteration endlessly of this and that and put this here and put that there and five days must pass before the cock crows and the swallows will retun thus and hence and the quadrilateral election of the bicameral housemaids must not coenside with the bifurcation of the empastulatur until the 6th day of every 4th month and holy mother fucking shit. And if you read about Freemasonry at all you will learn that their rules and rituals and lists of things proper and not proper.....they're a lot like the Constitution! The difference being you dont have to be under the rules of Freemasonry unless you want to. Why you have to be under the rules of the Constitution, I dunno. That is something I have never discovered, why that is. I guess the reason is because they say so: "they" being the officer who ultimately puts the handcuffs on you and takes you off to a concrete bunker there to live out your life. Under Masonry this never happens. Under the Constitution it's practically the norm.
     People are fond of insisting that Freemasonry - which you dont have to join - is a vast networking conspiracy to "take over the world." These same people insist that the Constitution - which actually is a vast networking conspiracy to take over the world - they insist its a noble document guaranteeing life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, even though this phrase is found in another document not remotely related to the Constitution.
     What the Constitution and Freemasonry do have in common however is meaningless rules that serve absolutely no purpose other than to confuse and bewilder the Learner of the Rules into thinking he is a superior being. When you learn the rules of the road and how to drive.....you dont go through any of this bullshit: you learn the rules and then you go driving. Freemasonry rules and Constitutional rules however serve no actually purpose: you dont know any more after you learn them than you did before you learned them. However yo do learn that the rules of the Constitution WILL eventually get you either into jail or into the poorhouse.

A Reading Comprehension Moment

below is the 4th amendment. for some reason americans not in the legal profession - which is most of them - think that this protects them against searches and seizures - or confiscations - or theft - or taking what does not belong to you, to put it into normal language. actually, if you read it - which you might consider doing as it is printed below and its very very short - actually what it does is authorize searches and seizures. how authorizing searches and seizures can be interpreted by Right Wing Patriotic Flag-Waving God-Fearing White Americans as PROTECTING THEM AGAINST searches and seizures....well, i have no explanation other than when mexicans call us "stupid white boy" - which they relentlessly do - they MIGHT be right.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Merrick Garland

merrick garland says he is devoted to the constitution. well he should be, it's paying his salary. you'll never hear a supreme court justice ever advocating shitcanning the thing. they'd be out of a fucking job; the constitution made supreme court judges possible. its a great life. they cant even get fired. of course they are devoted to it and preserving it and doing all the things the conservatives insist are not happening. liberal bureaucrats worship the fucking constitution. it's their ship, and its always coming in. so i dont know what the fucking conservatives are yapping about with their "we need to return to the constitution" crap. fucking idiots. we're neck-deep in the thing.

The Mind of the Conservative

conservatives want to "defend the constitution" until a decision regarding it - made by people created by the constitution - doesnt go their way. even though 99% of the conservatives are not constitutional lawyers and havent even read the thing, they are all constitutional experts and the constitution is supposed to "go a certain way." and the way its supposed to go is any way - apparently - but the way its going. they also want to "return" to "limited government" even though we have never had limited government: the constitution - which the conservatives want to return to - created an unlimited government. there is no such thing as a limited government. the constitution makes it real clear that it's power is monopolistic and vast and unlimited. any "limits" it has announced here and there have all been summarily ignored or gone around. because you cant limit something that has a legal a monopoly on something called "coercion." if you try to limit it it will coerce you into stopping. one way or another. however conservatives - like voodoo children - are convinced the constitution is a benign magical piece of heavenly brilliance which exists in a pure unsulllied state which has been besmirched by Liberals. no: its being OPERATED by liberals. Liberals love the existing constitution. conservatives love some non-existent constitution. this is why conservatives are not running things. they cant read.

The Constitution And Sharia: Buttbuddies Everlasting

there's a reason why muslims praise the constitution: they recognize its parent and eventual replacement: sharia. the difference between the constitution's litany of edicts and conditions and endless rules and OCD thises-and-thats and mohammed's litany of edicts and conditions and endless rules and OCD thises and thats is that the constitution had no camels in the room when it was assembled.