let's review part 2

the "creators" of the constitution decided that one all-powerful entity wasnt enough so they created three of them. this to them was unassailable logic. remember, these guys were bureaucrats. bureaucrats dont think like normal people do. they think like lawyers. meaning "reality is what we declare it to be." so they created three equally powerful entities and called this.......sit down for this......a BALANCE. not a partnership. the word "balance" when your civics teacher says it is supposed to make you think he is saying "mortal enemies vying impotently against each other to gain full control." what he is really saying is "three allies unified in dedicated determination against YOU." instead of creating one mad insane dog to order you around....they created a Cerberus!!!! Cerberus has never once pitted one of it's heads against one of the others. Cerberus is very unified in agreement that EVERYTHING THAT ISNT CERBERUS IS THE ENEMY. now: when you were first told that the legislative - which creates rules for you to obey - and the executive - which creates rules for you to obey - and the judicial - which creates rules for you to obey.....equaled a "balance of power"....implying that they would use some mystical fairy tale called "checks and balances" that would keep them powerless........you were being misinformed. they are a triad of power. just like Ancient Rome. there is nothing unique and magically original about the government created out of thin air by the constitution. its a triad of authority working in unison just like in Italy in 300 BC. thank you. god bless you.

let's review

because of the nature of government in the US unconstitutional laws are passed every billionth of a second by the three hundred thousand governments and government agencies americans live under because americans just cannot get enough governments the more the better. ten years later the supreme court, after all the other courts deal with the law, will decide - if the law gets there - will decide if it is actually unconstitutional or not. meanwhile people are being thrown in jail for disobeying the law that no one knows if its constitutional or not. if the supreme court gets around to deciding 5-to-4 or better that's its unconstitutional then you dont get arrested for it anymore. until five minutes later when the substitute law is passed that may or may not be constitutional. most laws never make it to the supreme court to find out if they're constitutional or not because there's not enough of a hubub about them. HUBUB is what determines what makes it to the supreme court. not the constitution. most laws do not get to the supreme court. so you will keep getting arrested for breaking them. you might also get arrested for not breaking ANY law, constitutional or not. you can get arrested due to the "because I said so" law. which is not even on the books. and might not even be constitutional: it's never come before the court to find out. thank you. and god bless you.

let's review!

bill of rights review.

in case you have never actually read or understood the bill of rights they are
1: you have the right to complain, gather into a crowd, and have an imagination.
2: you have the right to an "arm" meaning a weapon. not necessarily a firearm. the jury is still out on what this "right" actually means.
3: if there is a war you can be forced to house a soldier. whether it is a "friendly" or an "enemy" has never actually been decided formally.
4: you have the right to arrest, or in normal language, the right to be kidnapped, and you have the right to be looted.
5: you have the right to being charged with a crime after your right to an arrest has been granted.
6: you have the right to a "trial" to "determine" your "guilt" or "Innocence" after your right to an arrest has been granted.
7: you have the right to a "jury" trial after you right to an arrest has been granted.
8: you have the right to pay ransom for yourself after your right to an arrest been granted and you have the right to be tortured and/or executed after your right to an arrest has been granted.
9: this right has nothing to do with you.
10: this right has nothing to do with you.

and there you have it! the Fantastic Bill of Rights. It's yours, citizen! Enjoy!

You know what's really funny?.....you're told that certain bureaucrats "fought long and hard" to insist that these ten amendments adopted. I'm thinking things would have been a lot smoother for a longer period of time if they had lost that tussle.

limbaugh's worshippers

limbaugh's listener say the word "constitution" like catholic children used to be taught to say "jesus." catholics once had to bow their heads every time they said the name "jesus." what this accomplished was less and less catholics ever saying the name "jesus." because you had to bow your head. that was mandatory. it was never explicitly proclaimed that you would be committing a mortal sin - which see - but it was asumed by catholics that you were walking a tightrope between salvation and damnation if you said jesus without a head nod. conservatives have the same reverence for the word constitution. they all love this essay that they have never read. when you say constitution to rush limbaugh he never says "what do you like about it." he knows what you like about it: you like saying you like it. the idea that the constitution is actually the problem or even any part of the problem is a forbidden thought. it's like saying jesus is not in the bread disk, i mean the host. it's a forbidden thought. if jesus is not in the host then jesus didnt exist.  if the constitution is not the pathway to glorious liberty - even though its a complete curtailment of liberty - they YOU do not exist. and no one wants you not to exist.

the civil war

the loss by the South of the civil War should have proved to the North (ya know, the normal, non governmental citizens) that the Constitution is totally fraudulent. The Civil War loss by the South demonstrated that there really is no such thing as "States' rights." You see, the South assumed that the Constitution was something the Thing That IS Not A State - DC - paid attention to. Well, sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't. It depends on how the decision favors DC: which is what the Constitution was really written for: DC. Not "America." So the southern States basically stole real estate from DC. Countries traditionally don't like this. The South thought they were being nobel. Plus the slave owners like all the free 12 year old nubian nookie not to mention the white gals and teens liking jacking off the hung bucks.  But in the human species territory trumps gonads. It's always a close battle but territorial imperatives usually prevail. Because without territory there's no pussy. Just watch PBS nature shows if you don't believe that.

a moment from facebook

Jj Solari

12 hrs · 

"The U.S. Constitution has 4,400 words. It is the oldest and shortest written Constitution of any major government in the world."

and for some reason it's still not fully understood by anyone in government and is constantly being interpreted and reinterpreted and explained and re-explained in ways contrary to the original explanations and is "living" and changing and yet resolute and final and eternal and simple to understand and yet complex and needing of micro-examining and honing and deciding and re-deciding and declaring and molding and shaping and did i say interpreting? why it's almost mystical and chimerical, this amazing piece of rules and regulations written by a committee of British-loving homesick bureaucrats half drunk with sudden power and not-so-sudden bourbon. Hillsdale College makes millions "teaching" this Instruction Sheet For Bureaucrats all the while insisting its somehow actually talking to you. it isn't. it's talking to your owners. it's written for bureaucrats. it's not written for you. if you are mentioned at all its only by whimsical accident which is being constantly looked at for ways to remove them quietly and without incident.

Like

Like

Love

Haha

Wow

Sad

Angry

Comment

Share

Comments

Jj Solari how is it the first people to compose a constitution "got it right and perfect the first time " and all the other countries have not. that's not a real question. that's actually a disguised effort to try wake up at least one of your brain cells if only for a microsecond.

it's not written for you

The customary religious doctrine regarding the constitution is that it was written for the populace. It was actually written for bureaucrats. Only government employees are ever referenced with the possible exception of people who are under arrest - which is the main thrust of the bill of rights - it is possible that some of these arrestees are non government personnel. "We the people" is the people who composed the constitution. As is made clear once you start trying to read it. You will never be mentioned. Government will be the sole topic under discussion. You are not there. Except when arrested. Then you appear in the constitution

A Legal Document

When you tell a Republican or a conservative that the Constitution is a legal document, the "tilt" light goes on inside his head. To a Republican or a Conservative the Constitution is a holy collection of Scriptural utterances and Truths that were spoken by Jesus to the, ya know, people who signed their names to it after they had the town hall meeting that the public was not invited to where they voted on it. A lot of people voted against it. you never hear about them. People think I am the first person in American history to have a problem with the Constitution.

Since it is a legal document that means it sets out a ream of conditions. Legal documents are always filled with commands and "how things will be." With most legal documents all the people affected by it have to sign it. The Constitution is allegedly a contract. A contract that involves you personally. However you did not sign it. You are not supposed to see that as an impediment to your being bound under it. But since it is a Holy legal document which has Jesus involved in it since the Constitution is Sacred...then you should not have a problem with it. And you probably don't. In fact you take it on faith, like any good parishioner should, that everything is A-ok with it. Which in reality is not true. In reality the constitution is a hoax that you have bought into. Do I care? Not really, I never particularly liked you in the first place.

the constitution created marx

the constitution was the inspiration for Karl Marx to create the the perfect form of t=what the constitution is merely the outline for: communism.  it's not an accident that communists are always talking about "the people." they got the idea from the constitution's preamble. the first three words hit Marx like three thunderbolts. He probably hung aruond long enough to read the rest of the constitution before it hit him that the constitution was a monumental stroke of genius that itemizes the particulars and spells out how to operate a "dictatorship of the proletariat" which is actually just the opposite: a dictatorship of the jailers of the proletariat. Marxism deals in opposites as does, well, the democratic party in america, since they are both identical. this is not to say the republicans and the libertarians and the christian democrats and the nazis and all the other political parties are not marxist; they are. they just think they're something else. at least the democrats are smart enough to know they're marxists. which is of course the attraction; democrats are excited about no one having anything. the democrats are basically a primitive tribe like a mau mau or the apaches: everyone lives in the dirt, takes narcotics 24 hours a day and performs magical rituals to affect the weather. most primitive tribes have some version of the environmental protection agency which is the salient hallmark - other than universal poverty and warfare with other tribes - of primitive cultures. and modern cultures which are basically all primitive cultures. cultures are "group identities" that override individual identities. you'll notice that "business" focuses on individuals. cultures and governments focus on groups. this is why business is universally detested: it goes counter to tribal human history.

upholding the constitution

one of the most baffling things about the constitution is the injunction made by bureaucrats to other bureaucrats "to uphold" the constitution, "to defend" the constitution and to "be loyal to" the constitution. the baffling part is that these people always enthusiastically and even swear an oath to do these things. "Do you swear to uphold the Constitution....." etcetera? They all say "I sure do, bruvva" to that query. But how exactly do you uphold it? How does that action take place? For one thing the Supreme Court was created for the sole purpose of deciding what the constituton actually "says" and what it actually "means." I mean this has been going on since day one 200 + years ago. so should the question really be "do you swear to uphold the constitution no matter how it is interpreted long after you make this agreement"? well, that's kind of a funny thing to agree to, wouldn't you say? do you want someone that fucking wishywashy "representing" you in office? apparently you are not suppose to think these things through to that extent. in other words you are not supposed to think these things through to any sort of concrete reality. youre just supposed to keep it vague and mysterious and sanctified and religious.  which is all that government really is: a secular religion where magic happens as long as the people - whoever they are - will it into being: like scientologists postulating new realities and then they magically appear because "i said so." it's how an infant thinks, in other words.

your alleged right to bear arms

the right to bear arms is not the same thing as the right to own arms. your right to bear arms, constitutionally, means you have the right to be drafted. it does not mean you have the right of ownership of firearms. Now you might say "no one has ever said before that the right to bear arms means you have the right to be drafted. no one has ever said that." Well, i just said it and now that i have every anti-liberty, government-worshipping hebrew "constitutional lawyer" in america will be hot on the trail of making this clear.

your alleged right to bear arms - and lets assume it means you have a right to ownership of a firearm, which it does not actually say - your alledged right to bear arms means that a firearm is the only thing you have a right to own. not that a cop will hesitate to confiscate your guns, he wont, he'll take those along with everything else.

the more you put your faith in the constitution to "protect" you the more you put yourself into danger. your faith in a written list of edicts created by the ilk that is now running california is going to be a faith that is false. adam did the same thing: he put his faith in an impotent dragon anad became one himself. americans who expect the constitution - which has continually made things worse - to suddenly reverse course and make things better are putting their faith into a what is basically the mind of an idiot child.

islam and freedom of religion

the constitution never defines religion. it just says religion gets to slip out from under the weight of the restrictions inherent in constitution by being protected by the constitution. Only the constitution can have this kind of fantastic dexterity. because religion is never defined, islam, the only religion on earth that demands the death of all non members, is protected by the constitution. i would call this being an accessory or an ally or an enabler or a traitor. only the constitution could manage to get itself  into this kind of preposterous fix. to date no one seems to want to fix this because that would result in a constitutional pile of nonsense being fixed. and that has only happened once, with prohibition. prohibition was removed from the constitution and a problem in the constitution got fixed. imagine if everything in the constitution was removed. i know. you cant.

The Constitution: A Handbook For Bureaucrats

The plain fact which no one seems to ever see is that the Constitution was written for bureaucrats. It wasn't written for you. You are not mentioned. Only bureaucrats and government officials are mentioned. And they are mentioned relentlessly. You are not in there at all. Only government employees, and usually only the ones with tons of power and authority, are mentioned. The Constitution brings them into being and then to some extent explains what they can do. It all just springs into existence as if by magic thanks to the Constitution. It almost is a form of magic. And not the fun kind. It's kind of like black magic: magic that leads not to delight and applause but magic that leads to wars and confiscation and incarceration and conscription and every other form of obedience to people you never met.

you are not a branch of the government

the constitution created three branches of government that are supposed to keep rein on each other so that one of them does not become more powerful than the other two. they are supposed to remain equally powerful. over you. you are not a branch of the government. you are not in the constitution at all except at the beginning where it says we the people. you are supposed to imagine that you are one of those. actually only the people who signed the constitution are the "we the people" being talked about. you were not even born. so how can they have included you. it is only your wish-machine that is convinced you are part of the constitution. it's the same wish machine that convinces catholics a child molesting homosexual can cause jesus to enter bread dough after he says a few words of command. he can order god around. if you are a catholic you believe that. because all the catholics around you at birth told you that. without exception. they cant ALL be wrong can they?  same with the constitution. same with muslims and their 72 virgins entertaining their rotting corpses. none of it makes sense. but its what your culture told you. and without your culture what do you have. certainly not your own identity. no, you have someone else's - usually several peoples', in fact - identities. you barely exist. only the lies that other liars have told you exist. you are probably comprised of 100% lies, if you are the average person.

"Freedom of the Press"

It has been brought to my attention that the "press" is the only job other than bureaucratic dunce that is actually mentioned by the Constitution. The "press" is the only private arena that is mentioned. all the other arenas mentioned in the Consitution are governmental posts and departments.
     Hearing this it was as if yet another light had gone on in my head.
     This is why the "press" - today's press - has this attitude of "authority."
     The bureaucrats - the other "job" mentioned by the Constitution realize that the "press" is - like themselves - sacrosanct. that's why they fear the "press."
     The "press" realizes this. that is why they brazenly and relentlessly attack bureaucrats. Because they know they have been granted immunity by the Constitution.
     As far as the Constitution is concerned, saddle-making doesn't exist. Car making doesn't exist. Nothing exists except government and the press as far as the Constitution is concerned.
     This is why the press - and the bureaucrats - are the fucking free-for-alling pricks that they are. Because the Constitution grants them and no one else "official existence."

A Religious Document

The Constitution is a secular version of a religious document. It is attributed to have magical powers, one of them being that "We the people" means you - who did not exist when "We the people" got announced and addressed. The actual "we" in the "We the people" are the people who created and signed the Constitution. Now, I talk to a lot of stupid assholes. And they all say that the people who signed it were representing all the people who didn't. Which is not true. No "representative" has ever contacted the people he represents. No agreement has ever been made between bureaucrats and "the people they represent." this is part of the religious aspect of the Constitution: that it does things it doesn't, in reality,  on this planet, actually do.

Constitution Blurb of the Day.

lets forget about the preamble which is a collection of raving wishful thinking and jump right to the first sentence of the actual mess. "all legislative..." yada yada. first of all this sentence is a massive contradiction in itself. if congress has all legislative power....where did it come from?.....some other legislative power? who gave all that power to congress? the Power Broker Central Authority? or is it rather just an edict edicted by mysterious entities outside of Congress. or in other words, if congress has all legislative power then the declaration that it has all legislative power has no actual merit. it really doesnt have all legislative power. otherwise congress would be announcing this itself. but it isnt. the constitution is. so where did the constitution get ITS legislative power? i know, you're not supposed to look this deep into it. and second of all if congress has the only legislative power how is it that the president - who is not congress - has his own bucket of "executive orders" to draw edicts out of? you'll notice we're only two sentences-in. and the constitution is a thousand sentences long. you wonder why you're arguing politics morning noon and night. because its a morass of seaweed and diarrhea you're actually supposed to pay attention to. for some reason.

God, Jesus, and You

god created israel to wean humanity away from human government and to create individual liberty. jesus came to the remnant of israel - the jews - to wean humanity away from human government and to create individual liberty. between the american defeat of england and the implementation of the constitution, the efforts of god and jesus were achieved for the first time in human history. that freedom lasted 12 years. the constitution is actually a declaration of war against god and jesus. and its not accidental. its a legalistic declaration of the servitude of you to a collection of loafers who have opted to order you around and who you have opted to admire and respect. like idiotic Stockholm Syndrome victims. thank you. fuck you.

The Second Amendment

   The Second Amendment has never actually been "enforced." The day that the first weapon in the hands of the government military that was forbidden to the citizenry, that was the day the Second Amendment was successfully ignored and basically rendered void, and which continues to this day. Americans running around with their "assault weapons" and their pistols and rifles are no match for the Pentagon's war machine. So if the American military decides that the American citizenry is the enemy - which can easily happen if the military is filled with illegal aliens and / or Muslims - the American citizenry can pretty much kiss theier "assault weapons" and their pistolsd and their rifles o, and their asses, goodbye.

The Confederate Flag

   Lately the Confederate flag has come under fire for being a banner of slavery. However the real purpose of the Civil War was to take slavery out of the hands of private owners and put it exclusively into the hands of government. As the 13th Amendment clearly and briefly states. So the American flag is also a flag of slavery. Since we're all being so righteous here.