Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Constitutional Insight of the Day

 
 


   The Constitutional insight of the day actually happened a few days ago, not today. It was on Facebook. Yes, Facebook, where discoveries flourish. I posted "The Revolutionary War was fought by Americans. The United States was created by bureaucrats."
   And right there, inside those words somewhere is the insight. Did you see it? Did you see the insight? I will show you the insight in case you didn't see it: the Founding Fathers were bureaucrats. They weren't fathers. And they certainly didn't founded anything. They copied England. They just changed the name of the king and made him elected instead of born. That is not progress. That is copying. Calling the Founding Bureaucrats the Founding Fathers is like calling Druids "The Elders." They're still just people with no toilets or hot water or lights. They're not Elders. They're just "the old men who live with us." Which in Druid times "old man" came at about age 34. A 34 year old living in a lean-to and shitting into a ditch is not an elder. And a Druid descendent replacing a chant with a Constitution (I'm actually surprised it's not put to hymn music and sung in Congress) is not a Father. He's a blowhard bureaucrat pretending he knows what's good for you, writes it all out on paper and then insists that "We the people" includes you. Signed by him. Not by you. Why you are bound by someone else's agreement with himself is a mystery that has never been explained. Or even brought up, apparently. It's never up for discussion: why your signature is not on the Constitution. Theirs are. Why are the founding bureaucrats your agents arbitrating your sovereignty without you being involved? Because Constitutions are "sacred" documents deemed only create-able by The Elders. "We have given you a Republic. Let's see if you can keep it." Hey, who asked for it? You keep it. What even is one? Well, it turns out a Republic is something called a Republic. And that orders you around. Created by bureaucrats. America's first. And their progeny - of which you are still not one of - are doing it today, still. Meanwhile you - for some reason - are whining that "they are not following the Constitution." So what. Why should they? The founding fathers didn't follow it when they created it, and that was not a problem for you. So what if they don't follow it - or even do follow it? What difference does it make? If they follow it or if they don't you still are not involved. Or haven't you noticed.

No comments:

Post a Comment